The FC has ‘identified a number of areas regarding the Streets Ahead programme where SCC has fallen far short of good practice’.
To its credit, the FC has gone to great lengths in its investigation. But it stopped short of prosecution and it’s easy to feel disappointment at the lack of punishment.
The FC stated: ‘There is insufficient evidence to say with confidence that an offence of felling without a felling licence has been committed by SCC and Amey’.
The report is an important step on the road to resolution in Sheffield. Heavily criticising the council and its contractor, it draws a clear line in the sand.
The case has called into question just what rights and responsibilities councils have over the management of trees.
Lessons to learn for other councils
We have witnessed every twist and turn in this long running saga. At the same time, we’ve been working with councils and communities across the UK to prevent unnecessary felling. In most cases, we have found that council officers are doing a sterling job of managing their trees in the face of budget cuts and staff reductions.
So what does this mean for them? Sheffield is a cautionary tale, watched closely no doubt by every tree officer in the UK. The chances are it has made their lives more difficult. Sometimes it seems suspicion arises at the very suggestion of felling – even when it is appropriate.
Is that fair? Well yes, and no. We are waking up to a climate crisis. We need more trees, now, and we need to retain the ones we have wherever it’s safe to do so. But tree officers are a rare breed, and their job isn’t easy. They often need support, and not unfounded criticism.
Mistakes in Sheffield were related to contracts, decision-making and interpretation of the law. It’s not like that everywhere. The report published by the FC is a valuable case study. Councils should take heed of warnings about bad practice, but not be afraid to manage their trees appropriately.